<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Novelty and the Commodity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mutuallyoccluded.com/2009/03/novelty-and-the-commodity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mutuallyoccluded.com/2009/03/novelty-and-the-commodity/</link>
	<description>media &#38; film, design, philosophy, politics</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jacques Ranciere</title>
		<link>http://www.mutuallyoccluded.com/2009/03/novelty-and-the-commodity/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques Ranciere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mutuallyoccluded.com/?p=1304#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Does Badiou&#39;s approach preclude the one you suggest? As Badious awaits emerging Eventful truths (a veiled Judaism awaiting not one, but waves of returning Platonic messiahs) why not at the same time accept hybridity and look to the concrete particulars and map those out as Latour suggests?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Badiou&#39;s approach preclude the one you suggest? As Badious awaits emerging Eventful truths (a veiled Judaism awaiting not one, but waves of returning Platonic messiahs) why not at the same time accept hybridity and look to the concrete particulars and map those out as Latour suggests?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

